BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (applications nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15,  judgment of 25 May 2021): Convention compliance of the British secret surveillance regime including bulk interception of communications and intelligence sharing.

CENTRUM FÖR RÄTTVISA v. SWEDEN (application no. 35252/08, judgment of 25 May 2021): Convention compliance of the Swedish secret surveillance regime including bulk interception of communications and intelligence sharing.

PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALY (application no. 25358/12, judgment of 24 January 2017): prohibition of remunerated gestational surrogacy.

PARRILLO v. ITALY (application no. 46470/11, judgment of 27 August 2015): scientific research on human embryos and embryonic stem cells.

KHOROSHENKO v. RUSSIA (application no. 41418/04, judgment of 30 June 2015): prisoner’s right to family visits, resocialisation as the primary purpose of imprisonment, the State obligation to provide for an individualised sentence plan.

X. v. LATVIA (application no. 27853/09, judgment of 26 November 2013): the conflict between obligations derived from European Convention on Human Rights and the obligations derived from the Hague Convention on international child abduction, the “inchoate” custody right of a non-registered father

SÖDERMAN v. SWEDEN (application no. 5786/08, judgment of 12 November 2013): the State obligation to criminalise child pornography, evolutive interpretation of penal law in accordance with the international law obligations of the State, right to domestic compensation based directly on a violation of the Convention, even in the absence of a violation of national law.

SÕRO v. ESTONIA (application no. 22588/08, judgment of 3 September 2015): registration and public disclosure of former KGB employee as a lustration measure.

MARINIS v. GREECE (application no. 3004/10, judgment of 9 October 2014): the principle of prevalence of biological link in paternity and maternity actions.

VASQUEZ v. SWITZERLAND (application no. 1785/08, judgment of 26 November 2013): administrative expulsion of foreigner convicted of a sexual crime, although criminal court suspended expulsion, presumption of danger for public security based on decisions of dismissal of criminal proceedings.

KISSIWA KOFFI v. SWITZERLAND (application no. 38005/07, judgment of 15 November 2012): expulsion of a foreign citizen convicted of a crime of drug trafficking.

SHALA v. SWITZERLAND (application no. 52873/09, judgment of 15 November 2012): expulsion of a foreign citizen convicted of several crimes of minor gravity.

PONTES v. PORTUGAL (application no. 19554/09, judgment of 10 April 2012): court order for a child to be placed for adoption due to drug addiction of parents.

ASSUNÇÃO CHAVES v. PORTUGAL (application no. 61226/08, judgment of 31 January 2012): court order for a child to be placed for adoption due to negligent behaviour of parents.

VARAPNICKAITE-MAZYLIENE v. LITHUANIA (application no. 20376/05, judgment of 17 January 2012): public disclosure of medical data.

IYILIK v. TURKEY (application no. 2899/05, judgment of 6 December 2011): paternity presumption of the mother’s spouse.

ZAKHARCHUK v. RUSSIA (application no. 2967/12, judgment of 17 December 2019): expulsion of foreign, young citizen convicted of grievous bodily harm.

BABIARZ v. POLAND (application no. 1955/10, judgment of 10 January2017): right to divorce, the protection of de facto f amily life created by one of the spouses with another third person, unpredictable case law)

RAMADAN v. MALTA (application no. 76136/12, judgment of 21 June 2016): right to citizenship, prohibition of statelessness, revocation of citizenship due to annulment of false marriage.

SZABO AND VISSY v. HUNGARY (application no. 37138/14, judgment of 12 January 2016): mass surveillance for the purpose of national security.

BARBULESCU v. ROMANIA (application no. no. 61496/08, judgment of 12January 2016): employer’s surveillance of the employee’s Internet usage in the workplace within a private employment relation, termination of employment relation on the basis of the employee’s intercepted Internet messages, horizontal effect of the European Convention.