GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II) (application no. 38263/08, judgment of 21 January 2021): interrelation between international human rights law and international humanitarian law with regard to substantive obligation to protect the right to life, jurisdiction in international armed conflict)

FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA v. PORTUGAL (application no. 78103/04, judgment of 31 January 2019): suicide of in-house psychiatric patient, State obligation to provide health care to patient with suicidal tendency.

LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL (application no. 56080/13, judgment of 19 December 2017): medical malpractice in public hospital, State obligation to provide health care.

MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (application no. 10865/09, 45886/07 32431/08, judgment of 17 September 2014): organised State repression during transition to democracy, statute of limitations in criminal law, State obligation to punish crimes against humanity without any time bar, manipulation of legal classification of events in order to submit them to time limitations that would not apply if they had been
correctly classified.

CASE OF CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA (application no. 47848/08, judgment of 17 July 2014): death of severely mentally disabled, HIV‑positive Roma teenager in public orphanage, de facto representation of extremely vulnerable persons by NGOs before the ECHR, legal principles in the motivation of ECHR judgments, principle of equality and access to court.

TAGAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (application no. 26562/07 and 6 other applications, judgment of 13 April 2017): large-scale attack on a school and deficient anti terrorist operation which left more than 330 people dead, State obligation to prevent, plan, control and use lethal force in anti-terrorist operations in accordance with “strict necessity” test, amnesty to police officers involved.

BLJAKAJ AND OTHERS v. CROATIA (application no. 74448/12, judgment of 18 September 2014): lawyer in a divorce action threatened and attacked by the adverse party, State obligation to protect lawyers from work-related violence and against violent acts of mentally disturbed persons.

CAMEKAN v. TURKEY (application no. 54241/08, judgment of 28 January 2014): self-defence, reassessment of facts by the ECHR, principle of subsidiarity.

PERINÇEK v. SWITZERLAND (application no. 27510/08, judgment of 17 December 2013): denial of the Armenian genocide in a public conference, State obligation to criminalize the denial of genocide.

TREVALEC v. BELGIUM (application no. 30812/07, judgment of 14 June 2011): journalist injured by mistake by police officers who thought that he was attacking them, putative and excessive self-defence.

JEANTY v. BELGIUM (application no. 82284/17, judgment of 31 March 2020): detainee who make several attempts to commit suicide, State obligation to provide health care to detainee with suicidal tendency.

VOVK and BOGDANOV v. RUSSIA (application no. 15613/10, judgment of 11 February 2020): obligation to criminalise negligent actions and omissions, use of explosive devices by the military.

ZINATULLIN v. RUSSIA (application no. 10551/10, judgment of 14 January 2020): victim status before the ECHR regarding substantive violation of article 2, due to insufficient domestic compensation.

MAKUCHYAN AND MINASYAN v. AZERBAIJAN AND HUNGARY (application no. 17247/13, judgment of 26 May 2020): conviction of Azerbaijani national in Hungary for extremely cruel hate murder of a Armenian national, failure by Hungary to ensure that Azerbaijani national would continue to serve his prison sentence upon transfer to home country, pardon by Azerbaijan president o99f the murderer when he arrived home, Azerbaijan’s acknowledgement and adoption of crime “as its own”.

MARIUS ALEXANDRU AND MARINELA ȘTEFAN v. ROMANIA (application no. 78643/11, judgment of 24 March 2020): traffic accident caused by falling of a rottentree in a public road, State obligation to care for the safety of public roads and trees planted along the roads.

AKELIENĖ v. LITHUANIA (application no. 54917/13, judgment of 16 October 2018): failure to enforce a custodial sentence imposed on a fugitive double murderer, drawing arguments to the Government’s benefit from incomplete or insufficient sources, fallacy of ignorance (argumentum ad ignorantiam), treatment of classified documents.