MOUVEMENT RAELIEN SUISSE v. SWITZERLAND (application no. 16354/06, judgment 13 July 2012): freedom of speech of a minority in the public space and with new Internet technologies; protection of political, religious and commercial speeches.

TARANENKO v. RUSSIA (application no. 19554/05, judgment of 15 May 2014): freedom of expression and expressive conduct inside the premises of a public building, which a group of people including the applicant entered without authorisation.

DI GIOVANNI v. ITALY (application no. 51160/06, judgment of 9 July 2013): freedom of speech of a judge, procedural shortcomings of disciplinary proceedings against a judge.

YILDIRIM v. TURKEY (application no. 3111/10, judgment of 18 December 2012): collateral blockage of a site hosted on Google sites.

DRAKSAS v. LITHUANIA (application no. 36662/04, judgment of 31 July 2012): public disclosure of phone tapping records referring to unlawful exercise of public functions.

FABER v. HUNGARY (application no. 40721/08, judgment of 24 July 2012): ban of flag with a political meaning used in a public demonstration.

PRYANISHNIKOV v. RUSSIA (application no. 25047/05, judgment of 10 September 2019): refusal of a film reproduction licence after the authorities had issued distribution certificates for the films and verified that they were not pornographic.

ATV ZRT v. HUNGARY (application no. 61178/14, judgment of 28 April 2020): obligation on broadcasters to distinguish between facts and opinions in news and political reporting, journalistic objectivity.

MAGYAR JETI ZRT v. HUNGARY (application no. 11257/16, judgment of 4 December 2018): vicarious liability of operator of an Internet news portal for hyperlinks.